On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Daniel Rall wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Joshua Varner wrote:
>
> > On 9/19/05, Max Bowsher <maxb@ukf.net> wrote:
> > > Joshua Varner wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > I'll agree that symlinks aren't entirely portable, but the only motivation
> > > for out-of-repository hooks so far submitted has been to store the
> > > repository on a noexec mount. I think all OSes which support a noexec mount
> > > option are likely to also support symlinks.
> > >
> >
> > Another use case is to share hooks between multiple repositories. Have one
> > hook directory and link all of the repositories to that location.
>
> This use case can also be fullfilled by having the hook scripts from multiple
> repositories do nothing except exec the shared hook scripts.
>
Good point. I think we can close this as FIXED, since the symlink bug is
solved on trunk (thanks, Joshua for verifying that).
Thanks,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 19 22:28:03 2005