Hello list,
I just wanted to check up on the status of this patch. Is there anything I
need to change or additional comments about the patch?
Thanks,
Jean-Marc
On 9/2/05, Jean-Marc Godbout <jmgodbout@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, having read the code, it doesn't make sense to me either. So I guess
> I should try it and be certain.
>
> On 9/2/05, Ben Collins-Sussman < sussman@collab.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sep 2, 2005, at 1:20 AM, Jean-Marc Godbout wrote:
> > >
> > > Well thanks for creating doubt in my mind. I was certain that on
> > > the unpatched "ls"used to complain when it couldn't find the
> > > "checked-in" property. But I might be wrong, i might have done
> > > something wrong here. I'll verify. And yes, if there are problems
> > > then they should be fixed asap so that eventually this behavior
> > > could be phased out. I'll get back to you on that.
> > >
> >
> > I can't imagine why svn_ra_get_dir() would care about the DAV:checked-
> > in property; it's not necessary at all to fill in the svn_dirent_t.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.collab.net <http://www.collab.net> <> CollabNet | Distributed
> > Development On Demand
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Sat Sep 10 01:01:08 2005