Re: [RFC] Subversion 1.3 distribution tar slimmer?

On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>> I agree. In that case, I don't think we have to wait for 1.4 to
>> rip apr
>> and neon out.
>>
>
> Does this mean brane is "free" to post Win32 builds with the latest
> Neon
> now? I think a lot of people have wanted that for a variety of
> reasons.

I thought the issue was that svn 1.2 only supports neon 0.24, whereas
trunk (1.3) now supports either 0.24 or 0.25. I don't see why every
OS shouldn't use neon 0.25 with svn 1.3, assuming it's available; we
can simply recommend that in our INSTALL file and spread the word to
packagers.

-- 
www.collab.net  <>  CollabNet  |  Distributed Development On Demand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org