Re: [RFC] Subversion 1.3 distribution tar slimmer?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2005-08-31 21:10:56 CEST

Michael Sweet wrote:

> Hmm, I've successfully compiled Subversion 1.0 through 1.2.1 on all
> of our build systems, and few of them have libxml2, expat, zlib, or
> openssl installed...

That just means that you're not using ra_dav since it depends on libxml
or expat. ZLib an OpenSSL are completely optional.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 31 21:11:22 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jani Averbach: "Re: [PATCH] No error dialog if lock command failed"
Previous message: Branko Čibej: "Re: [PATCH] branches/wc-replacements: write relative path in working copy log"
In reply to: Michael Sweet: "Re: [RFC] Subversion 1.3 distribution tar slimmer?"
Next in thread: Peter N. Lundblad: "Re: [RFC] Subversion 1.3 distribution tar slimmer?"
Reply: Peter N. Lundblad: "Re: [RFC] Subversion 1.3 distribution tar slimmer?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]