Max Bowsher <maxb <at> ukf.net> writes:
> > Ben mention it could be implement by committing changes to a transaction
> > but
> > then just leave the transaction alive rather than committing it , But how
> > to
> > achieve this feature ? Did it need to modify SVN source code or just
> > implement it in Hook script? And How to let the pending transaction commit
> > to repository? Any comment will be appreciated
>
> It would require lots of new code.
> What exists so far is just the capability of the repository to store an
> uncommitted change. Very little of the logic to make use of that capability
> exists. In practice, just have developers commit to personal branches, and
> have the manager merge to trunk.
Also you will have to update the uncommitted transaction with textual merges.
An alternative approach would be storing things in svk patch, which is like
an uncommitted branch that can be later merged. And it should be quite
easy to build UI on it to do click-to-test and click-to-apply.
Cheers,
CLK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Aug 21 13:05:08 2005