[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: git is a lot better than SVN (???)

From: nick vajberg <nickvajberg_at_yahoo.dk>
Date: 2005-08-17 17:39:43 CEST

>> Is it just me, or is Linus' ego going off the deep
>> end again?

Anyone able to write a BitKeeper replacement in four
weeks flat should be allowed to have an ego, don't you

I obviously prefer SVN over CVS, but I find the
centralized model inferior in many respects. I've
tried utilizing svk to fix some of the problems, but
it's a mountain of hacks and doesn't integrate into
other clients.

Svk is a perl, but not quite a pearl.

While I realize that SVN has a main goal of replacing
CVS, adding svk-like features to the core would make
SVN a saner choice for large, distributed, semi-online

In short:

   SVN + SVK + Web front end + Mucho hardware =
SourceForge Killer.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 17 17:41:56 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.