Re: [Patch] Issue #2291 - 'svn ls -v' should return locking information - V7

On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 08:03 -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> I think it's best to keep the {filesize, date, filename} all next to
> each other, because it looks like the output of 'ls -l' that everyone
> is used to. IIRC, 'svn ls -v' was originally designed to mimic 'ls -
> l'. So I've removed the lock->date field altogether, and now only
> print the lock->owner field, right next to the last-author field:
>
> $ svn ls -v
> 1 sussman *sussman 3060 Apr 27 14:31 dutchwords
> 1 sussman 238080 Apr 27 14:31 bluechairs.z5
> 1 sussman 4829 Apr 27 14:31 bookreview.txt
> 6 sussman 72192 Apr 27 14:33 driver.z5
>
>
  Looks good, One last question before you commit this patch.
What happens if any lazy svn clients use 'svn ls -v' output (not using
libsvn_client) directly and parse the result (Just a wild thought) ?.

> This is what I'll commit, assuming tests pass. We can tweak more
> later if we want to.
   Thanks

Regards

-- 
########################
#####****######********#
####*~ *~*#####***~~***#
###*~*# *~*######*~~*###
##*~* ** *~*#####*~~*###
#***######***####****###
######################## 
 Alexander Thomas (AT)
 alexander@collab.net
 Collabnet Inc.
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org