Julian Foad wrote:
> Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Julian Foad wrote:
>>
>>> Ping! Did this bug ever get fixed? I think the bug being discussed
>>> is that
>>> when "svn lock" fails because somebody else already has the lock, it
>>> was only
>>> giving a warning but should be giving an error.
>>
>>
>> AFAICT, it didn't:-( I think a problematic thing is the
>> SVN_ERR_IS_LOCK_ERROR macro that hardcodes which errors are non-fatal
>> locking errors. That's a public macro:-(
>
>
> Goodness knows how we allowed that to become a public macro. It seems
> to be just a convenience for the RA layers.
>
> Fortunately, changing the implementation of it won't break binary or
> source compatibility (at least not directly, if it has been used
> sensibly). But anyway, even if we can't change it, it doesn't matter
> because we don't have to use it.
>
> So that's not a problem. Would you care to propose a fix, or shall we
> file this bug in the issue tracker?
Just deprecate the damn thing and put a private implementatin somewhere
else (the RA loader? Yikes, do RA layers even have RA-common headers?)
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 9 00:26:18 2005