kfogel@collab.net writes:
> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> > > -r PRIOR:N would work, or we could opt for something more magic, like
> > > -r :N or -c N or some such. Nothing really jumps out at me as superior.
> >
> > Check my patch -- it adds underlying support for exactly such a
> > keyword. All that it lacks is the parsing of some text (like "PRIOR")
> > into the new svn_opt_revision_range_prev "kind" I created.
>
> I really like the empty string solution ("-r:N") Greg proposed. It's
> essentially just as easy to type, but doesn't overload the current
> meaning of -rX, and thus could DTRT for diff as well as merge.
>
> Could we just support that, and leave -rX alone?
Works for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 4 20:05:44 2005