[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 'svn merge -rX' UI annoyance.

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2005-08-04 19:52:46 CEST

cmpilato@localhost.localdomain wrote on 08/04/2005 01:45:48 PM:

> Mark Phippard <MarkP@softlanding.com> writes:
> > 2) Last change, let's call this PRIOR. Meaning an item could be
> > in revision 14, 25, and 30. The value of PREV:30 would be 29:30. The

> > value of PRIOR:30 would be 25:30. Likewise, a value of 30:PRIOR would
> > 30:25 etc...
> Is there a meaningful difference between PREV and PRIOR, understanding
> that for an item that changes in 25 and 30, it looks the same in
> 26-30?

Probably not. Good point. So what is really needed is just the new N-1
behavior, I would agree that leaving PREV alone and calling this PRIOR
makes sense.


Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 4 19:53:43 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.