[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS failing regression tests?

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-08-03 17:58:14 CEST

Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> writes:

> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> > so we're not strictly breaking contract. Just means svn_fs_merge()
> > isn't nearly as useful as it could be.
> I disagree. Long ago, and for unrelated reasons, I asked if we
> could change this behavior. To me, a double delete is clearly a
> conflict. You can't delete what ain't. Furthermore, it has cost
> me real time in trying to explain to poor lusers why there are
> empty revisions with their name on them in our repositories.
> For whatever reason, it's rather popular around here to delete a
> file one of your co-workers has already deleted it. The result
> is an empty revision.

Fair enough. FWIW, I'm porting r13222 to BDB right now.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 3 18:01:15 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.