Re: [PATCH]: Ver 2: Re: Date processing should be more flexible

Christopher Ness wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 18:15 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>
>>Thanks. That's fine. Committed in r15459.
>
> Thanks for walking me though the process and offering reviews Julian,
> Norbert and Greg.
>
> What is the procedure for suggesting this to be released in the next bug
> fix version? Now it modifies the UI, so would it be a candidate for
> 1.2.2?

It isn't a bug fix nor anything urgent or important (apologies if it is
important to you), so it isn't a candidate for back-porting to the next bug-fix
release; instead this enhancement will appear in the next minor release
(version 1.3).

If it were a bug fix, the procedure would be to have a committer list it as a
candidate in the "STATUS" file for the 1.2.x branch, and then other committers
vote on it; if it gets enough votes then it would be merged to that branch.

Also, as you wondered, a candidate for a bug-fix release must not change the UI
(or any interface).

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 28 23:43:47 2005