> -----Original Message-----
> From: kfogel@collab.net [mailto:kfogel@collab.net]
> Posted At: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 2:16 PM
> Posted To: gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel
> Conversation: [PATCH] Issue 1628
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 1628
>
> Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> > >>I think you need to "get with the boys" on this one. Branko
clearly
> > >>states, "...because even a technically perfect patch wouldn't be
> > >>accepted if style wasn't correct" which is contrast to what you
are
> > >>saying above. I think one of the minor problems is there isn't an
> > >>official stance on the matter and it's up to an individual
committer
> as
> > >>to how much effort they are willing to expend.
> > >>
> > >
> > >No, "the boys", or rather, the boy, needs to get with me :-).
> > >
> > >Branko was simply wrong. And I'll bet he will admit that if he
> > >happens read this followup. (*He* might not apply such a patch,
but
> > >many, many such patches have been applied. And, actually, he
probably
> > >would too, if it were good in other ways.)
> > >
> > Oh well, to quote my original response to Mark:
> >
> > > But I certainly see the techincal side as being more important
than
> > > the stylistic side; if I didn't, I'd have made the final tweaks
> > > myself and committed the patch by now.
> >
> > So it seems that a lot of this conversation ie about something that
> > hasn't happened, nor is it likely to happen.
>
> Do you mean you never said "...because even a technically perfect
> patch wouldn't be accepted if style wasn't correct", which you were
> quoted as saying?
>
> If not, my apologies for trusting the quoter instead of checking the
> primary sources myself.
See the below message for the quote:
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=103189
- Valik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 26 21:18:34 2005