[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Logging: home-grown mechanism or syslog/event-log?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-07-21 02:46:42 CEST

On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 17:36 -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > for instance, while httpd uses a home-grown subsystem.
> Though there is also mod_syslog... is there a reason we have to choose
> just one? Or can we create an API and let either side of the debate
> implement their own? Then all we'd have to debate would be the default.

I believe I addressed this in my original message. The argument for
using platform-native logging facilities is not just to allow tying into
those facilities, but also to minimize the amount of code in our source
tree which isn't directly related to the problems Subversion is trying
to solve.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 21 02:48:32 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.