[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Proposal for Logging in Svnserve

From: nick vajberg <nickvajberg_at_yahoo.dk>
Date: 2005-07-14 12:17:12 CEST

> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:29:13 +0200 (CEST), nick
> vajberg wrote:
> >I disagree with brane that logging and debug
> logging
> >are different animals - that's just a load of crap.
> >
> >
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 23:03:48 +0200 (CEST), nick
> vajberg wrote:
> >Audit trails and technical logging has absolutely
> >nothing to do with each other. Audit trails belong
> in
> >a database you take backup of. Technical log
> entries
> >belong in a disposable file.
> >
> It's funny how you manage to say two exactly
> opposite things within 6
> hours of each other. Or maybe it's not funny at all.
Read the posts again. The guy is refering to audit
trails in the SOX sense, which is utterly different
from trace logging (which may or may not include debug

I would never consider using a log framework for audit
trails, and I didn't imply so.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 14 12:17:50 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.