[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Parseable tracking of code contributions.

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2005-07-14 01:50:32 CEST

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> Any objections to doing this? Would anyone find it burdensome to
> follow such conventions? I think we've grown to the point where we
> need some kind of automation for monitoring contributors, otherwise
> we're liable to let people fall through the cracks.

I've been using Submitted By: and Approved By: for quite some time, and
I think it's a good thing, but I think getting overly specific about
stuff like Analysis By: and Reviewed By: is going a bit far. Overall it
feels like the kind of thing that's primarily going to result in lots of
"hey, so and so did $foo and you didn't credit them in the log" type
conversations. We already have enough "you screwed up the formatting"
and "your log message violates this minor point in the rules" type
conversations as it is. Not that our code formatting and log message
rules are bad, just saying that we can take that sort of thing too far,
and I suspect this is heading down that path.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 14 01:54:54 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.