Re: [PROPOSAL] Addition of rsync algorithm for saving bandwidth in 'svn takeover'
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
 
Date: 2005-07-12 19:50:16 CEST 
On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:27 PM, Jonathan Gilbert wrote:
 I don't want to discourage you too much here, because this is a great  
 Over and over, I see people get frustrated that after a large import  
 In almost every case, the tree being "taken over" will be identical  
 Sure, once in a while somebody may have a slightly modified local  
 But I feel like we're disagreeing on the scope of the problem here.
  From where I sit, the problem has always been:
     "Oh no, I don't want to re-download the whole project!"
     Solution:  no worries, we'll only download just the few files  
 But you've focused on a problem that I don't think is really a problem:
      "Oh no, I don't want to re-download the whole file!"
     Solution:  no worries, rsync will only download small bits that  
 The problem is that we're no longer KISS.  Adding rsync-like code has  
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  | 
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.