Re: [PROPOSAL] Addition of rsync algorithm for saving bandwidth in 'svn takeover'
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-07-12 19:50:16 CEST
On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:27 PM, Jonathan Gilbert wrote:
I don't want to discourage you too much here, because this is a great
Over and over, I see people get frustrated that after a large import
In almost every case, the tree being "taken over" will be identical
Sure, once in a while somebody may have a slightly modified local
But I feel like we're disagreeing on the scope of the problem here.
From where I sit, the problem has always been:
"Oh no, I don't want to re-download the whole project!"
Solution: no worries, we'll only download just the few files
But you've focused on a problem that I don't think is really a problem:
"Oh no, I don't want to re-download the whole file!"
Solution: no worries, rsync will only download small bits that
The problem is that we're no longer KISS. Adding rsync-like code has
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.