"Brian W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@collab.net> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:44 -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 2005, at 3:38 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > >> Developers: should we document --non-interactive more precisely? Or
> > >> should we fail to launch $EDITOR in the presence of this option?
> > >
> > > I know this conversation has been had before, and that some folks
> > > (perhaps/probably even myself) were thinking that --non-interactive
> > > doesn't need to affect the use of $EDITOR because one can always do
> > > --editor-cmd=/bin/false or something. Whatever I used to think, I've
> > > since come around to thinking --non-interactive should be a one-stop
> > > shop for making an invocation of the command-line client completely
> > > scriptable, free of auth, log message, or any other kinds of prompts.
> >
> > Karl and I agree. If others agree, then perhaps we should file a bug.
>
> I totally agree.
Fie on the filing of bugs! "We are men of action; lies do not become us."
Fixed in r15277.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 6 19:56:42 2005