Re: [PATCH]: Re: Date processing should be more flexible
From: Norbert Unterberg <nunterberg_at_gmail.com>
 
Date: 2005-07-06 12:52:23 CEST 
2005/7/6, Christopher Ness <chris@nesser.org>:
 Actually, it is not. The ISO standard relies on the number of digits,
 2005-03-05: March 5, 2005
 The dash is optional, so 2005-03-05=20050305, 2005-03=200503,
 See also: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
 Norbert
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  | 
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.