On Jul 5, 2005, at 3:38 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>
>> Developers: should we document --non-interactive more precisely? Or
>> should we fail to launch $EDITOR in the presence of this option?
>>
>
> I know this conversation has been had before, and that some folks
> (perhaps/probably even myself) were thinking that --non-interactive
> doesn't need to affect the use of $EDITOR because one can always do
> --editor-cmd=/bin/false or something. Whatever I used to think, I've
> since come around to thinking --non-interactive should be a one-stop
> shop for making an invocation of the command-line client completely
> scriptable, free of auth, log message, or any other kinds of prompts.
>
Karl and I agree. If others agree, then perhaps we should file a bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 5 23:32:03 2005