Re: svn trunk r15199: FAIL (win32 ra_local bdb)

From: D.J. Heap <dj_at_shadyvale.net>
Date: 2005-06-30 14:09:52 CEST

Can these expected-to-fail-indefinitely tests at least put FAT in the
subject so they can be easily ignored until there is some expectation that
they pass?

These are the tests that are running on FAT and failing due to that, right?

Thanks!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 30 15:17:56 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: D.J. Heap: "Win32 test failures"
Previous message: Madan U Sreenivasan: "Re: [PATCH] Partial fix for Issue #443: post-commit hook script (error) output lost."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]