Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <036c01c57afb$11f89190$e6ec6f83@chimaera>
> "Re: svn commit: r15177 - trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn" on
> Mon,
> 27 Jun 2005 10:32:00 +0100, "Max Bowsher" <maxb@ukf.net> wrote:
>
>> Also, If this is just a temporary change for debugging, why commit it at
>> all?
>
> My answer is same as David's one.
>
> I'm debugging the problem that Ruby bindings courses
> segmentation fault on Jani's environment. But the problem
> doesn't occurred on my environment. So I'm embedding debug
> print statements and checking svn-breakage list.
>
> I can ask Jani to apply my patches but that costs Jani. So I
> decided that I committed some debug print statements. Now,
> Ruby bindings tests on Jani's environment are automatically
> executed with some debug print statements.
>
> But I don't know which is better way to do this. Should I
> ask Jani to apply my patches or commit to trunk?
Trunk's fine, I didn't realize it was for svn-breakage. I think I've done
something similar myself, once.
The best thing to do is to mention svn-breakage in the log message, so that
anyone seeing it understands what is happening.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 28 18:11:18 2005