Hi Philip
Thanks for your response. Look at r4 below; If base revision was taken
as the working copy (WC) revision when the move operation was
performed, then /newdir@4 should have been copied from /dir@3 (the WC
was @3) and not from /dir@1 as the log indicates.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r4 | stoor | 2005-06-27 12:16:05 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2005) | 1 line
Changed paths:
D /a.txt
D /dir
A /newdir (from /dir:1)
A /newdir/b.txt (from /dir/b.txt:3)
A /newdir/c.txt (from /dir/c.txt:3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Sukhmeet
On 6/27/05, Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
> Sukhmeet Toor <toorsukhmeet@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Notice first that some moves are treated as a DELETE followed
> > by an ADD (r9), while some are treated as an ADD followed by a DELETE
> > (r4 and r8).
>
> The order of the names in the log message does not imply that one
> happens before the other. As far as log is concerned they happen
> togther.
>
> > The problem that I'm facing is that in r9, the base
> > revision for newdir is 8 while it should have been 4, as it was last
> > modified in revision 4 (moved from /dir).
>
> Ever revision number applies to all items in the repository. newdir
> might be unchanged between r4 and r8, but that doesn't change the fact
> that you copied newdir from the r8 tree.
>
> --
> Philip Martin
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 27 20:16:06 2005