yes, that's what i'm saying,
cheers,
andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Worley [mailto:dworley@pingtel.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:01 AM
> To: Andy Cutright; dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: RE: possible bug
>
> > From: Andy Cutright [mailto:Andy.Cutright@borland.com]
> >
> > if i use the revision number associated with the log i
> always get the
> > version i'm expecting. if i use the date associated with
> the same log
> > message, i get either no version if i'm trying to checkout the first
> > controlled version of an element in the repository, or i get
> > the version
> > just before the the one i'd expect for later commits. if i bump the
> > command line checkout revision date up by 1 second, i get the
> > version i
> > expect. if i bump the date up by 1 millisecond using the javahl
> > libraries, i get the the version i expect.
>
> What you're saying is that when you specify a date/time,
> Subversion interprets it as the last revision *before* that
> date/time, not the last revision *before or at* that date/time.
>
> Dale
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 27 20:11:16 2005