Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Include offending XML in "Malformed XML" error message

On 22 Jun 2005 15:14:51 -0500, kfogel@collab.net <kfogel@collab.net> wrote:
> Charles Bailey <bailey.charles@gmail.com> writes:
> > I've no problems with that. I would have problems with CollabNet
> > asserting next Tuesday that Subversion was (t)henceforth a proprietary
> > product, and any further use would require payment of a license fee.
> > I assume that's not the case (and it would arguably be hard to do in
> > any event), but thought it prudent to ask, since I'm new to this
> > process.
>
> Just to make absolutely clear here, in case others are worried by
> these questions:
>
> CollabNet cannot do that. The "latest free copy of the code" would
> then become the starting point for a new free fork, and every
> developer here would simply follow that fork.

Thanks; that sounds great. I'm not a lawyer (really!) nor am I trying
to create a problem where none exists. I did want to make sure I
understood the standards of the Subversion community -- and don't want
to deal with grumpy folks at the university that employs me if it
turned out I was writing code (solely) for someone else's commercial
venture.

We now return to our regularly scheduled discussion of string escaping.

-- 
Regards,
Charles Bailey
Lists: bailey _dot_ charles _at_ gmail _dot_ com
Other: bailey _at_ newman _dot_ upenn _dot_ edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org