Thanks, that info helped.
It got me thinking.
Hmmmm....nothing changed but the version.
My RPM messes with the version number.
Hmmm....take out the messing with the version number and it works!
I now remember that I did the same thing on the RHEL-3 and RHEL-4 RPMs.
I'm not sure why it NOT messing up on the pre-RC and RC series, but, I
think this way should work all the time.
I think I used to mess with the version number before the Subversion
devels started doing it differently.....
Anyway, thanks for the clues.
I think I should have some RPMs by tonight or tomorrow.
- David Summers
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, James Athey wrote:
> I just ran make check, and everything passed, including getopt_tests.py.
> Two tests were automatically skipped: revert_tests.py and utf8_tests.py.
> Perhaps there's something different in our two build environments? Here's
> the version information for some relevant packages on my system:
> gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)
> GNU Make version 3.79.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
> Installed package: glibc.i686 0:2.3.2-27.9.7
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Summers [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:15 PM
> To: James Athey
> Subject: RE: Subversion RPMs for Redhat 9
> It was the getopt test that checks the output of the svn command.
> Really wierd.
> Probably something to do with how I build the RPM or something.
> - David
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, James Athey wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:41:14 -0400
>> From: James Athey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> To: 'David Summers' <email@example.com>
>> Subject: RE: Subversion RPMs for Redhat 9
>> Which test fails for you? I ran ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode
>> and make on the released 1.2 tarball and it compiled fine. I didn't
>> try running it yet, though.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Summers [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:16 PM
>> To: James Athey
>> Subject: Re: Subversion RPMs for Redhat 9
>> I have been working off and on trying to get the released code to compile.
>> Very frustrating. The pre-released code compiled fine no problems but
>> the released code is failing one test and I don't see any significant
>> changes between them. At this point I'm going to have to ask the
>> devel group as I don't understand why the test is failing.
>> Don't know for sure when I will have those RPMs.....I guess I could
>> temporarily disable the tests but I hate to do that without
>> understanding why the test is failing.
>> - David
>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, James Athey wrote:
>>> I was happy to stumble onto your page of Subversion RPMs for Redhat
>>> 9, http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/redhat-9.0/bin/
>>> , and I notice that no Subversion 1.2 RPMs are available yet. Are
>>> there plans to post these soon? If no, I'll just install it from source.
>>> James Athey
>>> Tresys Technology, LLC
>>> (410) 290-1411 ext. 135
>> David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware
>> email@example.com PGP Key:
>> PGP Key fingerprint = 0B44 B118 85CC F4EC 7021 1ED4 1516 5B78 E320
> David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware
> firstname.lastname@example.org PGP Key:
> PGP Key fingerprint = 0B44 B118 85CC F4EC 7021 1ED4 1516 5B78 E320 2001
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = 0B44 B118 85CC F4EC 7021 1ED4 1516 5B78 E320 2001
To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Mon Jun 13 00:17:08 2005