Re: svn log -v in v.1.2.0 much slower than in v1.1.4

John Peacock wrote:
> Simon Large wrote:
>> Windows network share access may be slow, but not _that_ slow.
>
> Oh yes it is! Windows filesystem [in general] degrades very badly
> with the
> number of files involved; BDB works better than FSFS in this respect
> since there
> are many more [small] files used in FSFS than the few [large] files
> in BDB. But
> that being said, I don't know why 1.1.4 -> 1.2 should make that much
> difference...

Yes, but ... 5 minutes to get the log for 1800 files in 127 revisions?
That's a pretty small repository. Apparently r1 was a one-hit import,
and according to filemon there were > 600,000 accesses to
Repository\db\revs\1 while fetching the log messages. Why so many
accesses?

BDB won't work here as it is accessed over a network share.

Simon

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org