On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 19:17 -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:05 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>> > Over ra_svn, it is quite possible for the server to log what the client
>> > is doing (with the exception that we can't distinguish an update from a
>> > checkout)
>>
>> What about switch too? And diff vs merge?
>>
>> Is 'status -u' distinguishable from update, over ra_svn?
>
>You can tell switch from update, and status -u from update, but probably
>not diff vs. merge.
>
>I guess I don't see the need for server-side logging of stuff that only
>matters to the client. Can you demonstrate a need for that specific
>variety of logging?
Two major use cases are:
1. Gathering usage statistics for reporting.
2. Creation of audit trail for debugging or security analysis.
This variety of logging produces data which is not only useful to end
users for trend tracking and stats, but also very useful to
administrators who need to know how their servers are being utilized (or
abused).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 7 19:28:20 2005