[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] operation logging

From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2005-06-06 15:25:55 CEST

Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> It's not about versions: it's about capabilities. You can't know in
> advance all versions of all clients-to-be-developed and the versions
> in which they will add certain capabilities.
> In other words, I'm against adding the version number to the stream.

I wasn't advocating version numbers either, merely that there could be a
good reason to add some client->server communication for the server to
make better decisions about serving that particular client. I agree
that a capabilities listing (much like SMTP et al use) is a much better
way to handle it. However, the rub comes in defining those capabilities
in a consistent yet extensible way.


John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 6 16:04:33 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.