On Fri, 27 May 2005, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2005, at 5:44 PM, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
>
> > Is there any interaction with this and the symlink permission issue
> > just
> > posted about?
>
> I don't know... I haven't tested it any further, but seeing as we're
> still attempting to change the permissions on a link to a file that
> hasn't shown up yet, I'm pretty sure it's still broked (that is, that
> there's still a race).
>
I don't think there is a race here. I don't think we should try to make
svn:special files read-only. For a symlink, making the file the link
points to read-only is wrong; it's the link that's locked not the
destination.
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 28 22:44:35 2005