Tez Kamihira <tez@kamihira.com> writes:
> > You don't explicitly say that an SCS file should be acceptable to the
> > 'patch' program -- i.e., today's 'patch' would just ignore anything it
> > didn't know about. I assume this is a goal?
>
> In the meantime, to find the most suitable format itself _is_ the
> goal. I'm not so sure what kind of application would be possible from
> the result. Extended 'patch' is certainly one of them, of course.
I'm not talking about extending the patch program, just to be clear.
I'm talking about making sure the SCS format is "compatible" with
today's patch program, in the sense that patch will do as much as it
can with an SCS file and silently ignore the stuff it can't handle
(such as metadata).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 28 17:01:52 2005