Re: RFC: Log Message Templates via new hook.

Mark Phippard <MarkP@softlanding.com> writes:
> all cases, then a dynamic system seems like the only possibility.
> Personally, I think the dynamic system might be overkill, but it could
> well be that you have a lot of requests for it queued from CollabNet
> customers.

Not at all -- and believe me, if we *did* have such requests, you can
bet I'd be using them as ammunition in the discussion! :-).

> The irony here, is that I still think that if you go with the dynamic
> approach, you are going to have to supply a sample hook that is driven by
> properties stored in the repository. If it isn't, then I doubt you will
> see many hosting services provide a hook as they are not going to want to
> maintain the hook for every customer.

I agree.

I favor an inherited properties solution. I would much prefer it.
However, I just want to be sure we know how to *do* it. If I seem to
favor the hook solution, that's only because it contains no mysteries
anymore.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 27 23:01:11 2005