kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jostein@josander.net> writes:
>> Also, I ask for help to get rid of the branches I made and/or merge
>> them into their respective release branches; I don't have nerves to
>> even look at them in a browser at the moment.
>
> Thanks for all your work so far!
>
> Unless someone's going to pick up those branches and work on them
> actively, I suggest we just remove them. They can always be restored
> later, after all.
>
> Jostein, it's these two, right?
>
> innosetup-hsuninsfix-4x-1.1.x/
> innosetup-hsuninsfix-5x-1.2.x/
>
>> I will monitor the lists and the #svn*'s and respond and participate
>> when I feel for it. However: I will try to keep my heartbeat frequency
>> below 60 bpm's as much as possible.
Jostein: Without doing any further work on the branches, could you comment
on whether you did not +1 the changes in STATUS yourself because you were
uncertain about their correctness, or just because you didn't realize you
could vote?
Also, is there any further description of what exactly the bug that these
changes fix is - perhaps somewhere in the mail archives? If you got any
information about the bug solely in private email, could you post details to
the list?
Thanks.
Karl: The 1.2.x branch should probably just be committed to trunk (there
have been no changes to the files concerned since 1.2.x forked). At that
point, the existing branch becomes a standard temporary backport branch.
(Branch necessary due to some renaming on trunk).
The 1.1.x is a branch-only-bugfix, so its existence is not against project
policy - it is only a two line change, so perhaps we should let it remain in
STATUS for a while, in the hope that someone will review it?
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 23 20:27:11 2005