On Sun, 22 May 2005 sussman@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: sussman
> Date: Sun May 22 18:46:36 2005
> New Revision: 14800
>
> Modified:
> trunk/www/svn_1.2_releasenotes.html
>
> Log:
> * www/svn_1.2_releasenotes.html: a couple of wording clarifications.
>
> Modified: trunk/www/svn_1.2_releasenotes.html
> @@ -113,10 +113,11 @@
> (<a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2306"
> >Issue #2306</a>)</li>
>
> -<li>'svn lock' may lock incorrect repository object if file is
> - 'switched'.
> - (<a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2307"
> - >Issue #2307</a>)</li>
> +<li>'svn status -u' incorrectly believes that all locks on "switched"
> + files are broken.
> + (<a
> + href="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2307"
> + >Issue #2307</a>)</li>
>
No, the original description was better. what happens is that when you
lock a switched path, it will lock the wrong path in the FS. From my
testing, svn st -u behaves correctly in this respect.
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 23 11:21:20 2005