[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Log Message Templates vs Server->Client Configuration.

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-05-18 04:17:40 CEST

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 17:32 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > Have a generic repos hook called 'inquiry'. It can read its
> > parameters (the first parameter is always a subcommand) and read
> > stdin, and depending on the subcommand it may or may not write to
> > stdout. We define calling disciplines for various subcommands: what
> > further parameters they take, what if anything to expect on stdin, and
> > what if anything they can write to stdout.
>
> How is this any different from the generic ra_svn command layer, or the
> ra_dav custom report mechanism?

Well, we to use the generic ra_svn command layer and the ra_dav custom
report mechanism to implement this, clearly.

Is the question you're asking: "Why one hook, instead of a separate
hook for each feature?"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 18 04:54:03 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.