[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Log Message Templates vs Server->Client Configuration.

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2005-05-17 23:07:46 CEST

On Tue, 17 May 2005, C. Michael Pilato wrote:

> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
> > > Just for the record. IMHO we don't need it for log templates, either. It
> > > may be sexy to have them generated based on the set of paths to be
> > > committed, but that /is/ overkill IMNSHO.
> >
> > I don't think it's at all overkill for situations like the ASF
> > repository. If a single repository-wide log template were good enough
> > for the vast majority of cases, I don't think we'd have seen the
> > per-directory functionality in CVS.
>
> I think there's no doubt that we want per-directory-tree log message
> templates. But then, I also want per-directory-tree generic
> server->client configuration dictations, for things like auto-props
> and ignores and such.
>
Yes. Multiple projects might share a repository. I think it would be a
mistake to limit ourselves to per-repository configs.

Best,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 17 22:59:23 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.