[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r14756 - branches/1.2.x

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2005-05-17 20:30:14 CEST

On Tue, 17 May 2005, Greg Hudson wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:21 +0200, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> > Yes, so from an API perspective it is wrong to call svn_ra_initialize from
> > a program that doesn't directly use libsvn_ra.
> I'm not quite sure what you mean by this statement. It sounds like we
> have to link against -lsvn_ra if we use svn_ra_initialize (on some
> platforms), but I don't think it's wrong for a 1.2 program to call
> svn_ra_initialize if it doesn't directly call any other svn_ra
> functions.
It is more a philosofical argument. If I use library A which uses library
B (as more or less an implementation detail), should I have to initialize
B? We both want to avoid any initialization calls at all, but that's
another story.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 17 20:22:17 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.