[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Blame issue

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin_at_dberlin.org>
Date: 2005-05-16 19:33:22 CEST

On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 16:22 +0000, John wrote:
> This probably isn't a bug - but no one has replied on the users list, so
> appologies for posting it here:
>
> I have a .cs file I'm using Blame on. One line that was added in r607, and not
> changed since, is being listed as r610 (HEAD).
>
> If I use the log viewer in TSVN to examine my file (changes between r609 and
> r610) it correctly shows that a particular line was *not* changed in 610. Doing
> R to R-1 comparisons using TSVN, it shows the line was indeed added in 607, and
> not changed since.
>
> However Blame (TSVN and command line) seems to think the same line was changed
> in 610. Why should it do that?? I know you've done speed-up changes in SVN1.2,
> is it no longer looking at individual rev changes, but instead grouping them
> together in some way?
No, not yet.

and blame is doing it the other way around right now (IE 607 to 610, not
610 to 607)

You get different results depending on the LCS algorithm used, which
direction you blame in, blah blah blah.
Blame is not an algorithm where this is always a single correct answer.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 16 19:34:41 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.