Re: assertion when locking files in different paths on RC4

On May 14, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Philip Martin wrote:

> Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
>
>> Nice analysis, Philip. Can you file this as a 1.2.1 bug, and assign
>> it to fitz? I think this was his code. :-)
>
> I committed the simple fix in r14736. There's a performance hit
> compared to the old code, but it's hard to do better with the current
> access baton code and lock/unlock are still no worse than other
> operations that lock the tree.

Thanks for getting this. My intention with the 0 depth lock was to
avoid the performance hit of locking the whole tree, but I didn't know
that the adm_access design didn't really support that. :(

-Fitz

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 16 01:39:09 2005