[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r14707 - branches/innosetup-hsuninsfix-5x-1.2.x

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-05-14 02:42:02 CEST

"Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jostein@josander.net> writes:
> I didn't feel criticized, just annoyed. This felt like hair in the soup
> or something. I have a quick temper, but usually cools down again. :-)

Well, Philip's questions are a bit more than just hair in the soup.
Trunk is preferable because more poeple watch trunk commits than watch
branch commits (especially when it's not a release branch). Also,
conceptually, trunk is the "master source" for all changes in the
project. By default, changes should enter on trunk and be ported out
to branches, unless there's a specific reason to do it differently.

So whenever someone starts doing work on a branch that seems like it
could be done on trunk instead, people will ask why. As Ben said,
it's nothing personal.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 14 03:17:32 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.