On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 19:50, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On May 12, 2005, at 8:54 AM, Madan US wrote:
> > Question : should these be fixed as part of issue #443 or should
> > separate
> > issues be filed for these commands invoking the commit implicitly...
> >
>
> Don't forget 'svn rm URL' and 'svn cp URL URL' and 'svn cp wc URL'
> and 'svn import'. They all cause commits too.
>
> I would imagine that all of these commands share similar commit code,
> so I think they're all part of issue 443.
mmm... they do share similar code.... but am thinking shouldn't they be
using the *same* code....??? am looking at mkdir and looks like it needs
changes that I did for commit to be redone in mkdir flow... :-(
yes, all these should be done....yes, but in 443?.... mmmm.... I will
try to get this done....
Thanks,
Madan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 12 17:47:51 2005