Re: svn commit: r14643 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_client libsvn_ra_dav libsvn_repos libsvn_wc

"Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
> why not handle this case in the wrapper isntead (by creating a pool and
> destroying it after the call)? Do we need the NULL pool handling in the
> new API?
>
> (I'll do a complete review tonight, if I don't fall asleep while going to
> bed "just for five minutes", which I did yesterday:-)

Philip Martin wrote:
> [much the same thing]

Yes -- I have no idea why I didn't think of such an obvious thing in
the first place. <hides head in shame>

Fortunately, Max Bowsher fixed it in r14647, and I've already voted
for it in STATUS. If you guys have time to do the same, that would be
great.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 9 18:54:48 2005