D.J. Heap wrote:
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>
>> That seems likely to fix the problem, or if we don't want to rev
>> svn_repos_history2 (perhaps so that such a change could be merged into
>> a subsequent 1.2.x release) we could also change svn_repos_get_logs3
>> to call svn_repos_history2 iteratively with progressively further back
>> ranges of revisions until it finds enough revisions to satisfy the
>> limit argument.
>>
>> -garrett
>
>
> Yes, both your and Greg's ideas would remove the need for an interface
> change and significantly improve efficiency. It seems like Greg's
> method would be somewhat more efficient although a slightly more complex
> change?
Yes, that seems to be the case.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun May 8 19:25:08 2005