Re: ideas to make svn update faster.

On Sunday 08 May 2005 17:35, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 16:35 +0200, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > I actually used https, since the update is reading I'm pointing this
> > out as I'm not sure thats handled by dav..
>
> It is.  A lot of our working copy inefficiency is specific to the ra_dav
> layer; you might try experimenting with the ra_svn layer (i.e. using
> svnserve) and seeing how much that helps.

Do I understand correctly that the local filesystem access is different
based on which network layer I choose?
I assumed similar slowness since its slow with or without any updates coming
in over the network. But I gather that I should avoid https so detecting
local changes becomes faster. Wierd :)

Thanks.

-- 
Thomas Zander