Branko Čibej wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>> What would we say to rolling rc3 on Monday? Ben Reser, does that work
>> for you? That would give us the weekend to vote on pending STATUS
>> items (of which there are currently 10, but only 2 or 3 have any
>> complexity to them).
>>
>> Assuming no showstoppers, rc3 would be the final candidate,
>> essentially identical to 1.2.0, which would be released one week
>> later. Of course, were we to find a bug in rc3 severe enough to
>> warrant rc4, that would re-start the 1-week resoak.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
> I think we have to fix the propchange-commit bug that Stefan found
> before rolling RC3. Otherwise, +1.
Oh, and what about the hotcopy problems D.J. Heap describes? I'm
positive we want those fixed in 1.2.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 7 04:00:39 2005