Re: [PATCH] Automatic rebuilding of build files
From: Max Bowsher <maxb_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2005-05-03 15:17:46 CEST
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
I can *partially* see the point of this, but I'm not fully convinced.
I can see how it might be slightly helpful for these files to be rebuilt
Also, you are *never* going to be able to make it fully automatic, because
I'm going to make some specific observations on the patch below, but that
>> Index: Makefile.in
No accounting for changes to build/ac-macros/*.m4
./autogen.sh allow alternate autoconf programs to be specified through
>> +# autoheader might not change svn_private_config.h.in, so touch a stamp
Stamp file should be a sibling to the file it relates to.
>> +subversion/svn_private_config.h: stamp-h
Would it not be better to save time and regenerate only the files that
>> +config.status: $(srcdir)/configure $(srcdir)/stamp-h.in
srcdir. And don't specify build.conf on the command line, since that is not
And lastly, is it really safe to rely on timestamps to prevent these rules
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.