[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.2 resoak?

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2005-04-26 23:47:58 CEST

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> The question I'm placing on the table is: is there some sort of extra
> testing we can do so that our collective conscience doesn't feel
> guilty about a 3-week resoak? I know that the Collabnet employees
> have some extra bandwidth we can spend in testing, if we can get some
> consensus on exactly what/how we should be testing.

Some testing ideas:

1. Get 1.2.0-rc2 installed on svn.collab.net.

2. Run the 1.2.x regression tests with pool debugging under valgrind
   (I would expect export failures if --enable-dso is used).

3. Test network compatibility: run the 1.2 regression tests against
   1.1 and 1.0 mod_dav_svn and svnserve. Run the 1.1 and 1.0
   regression tests against 1.2 mod_dav_svn and svnserve.

4. Test library compatibility: build 1.1.x, then arrange for the 1.1.x
   binaries to use the 1.2.x libraries, then run the 1.1.x regression
   tests.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 26 23:49:33 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.