Re: svn 1.2 resoak?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-04-26 21:19:27 CEST

My personal feeling is that we don't need a resoak, but I don't feel
strongly about the matter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 26 21:20:46 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: kfogel_at_collab.net: "Re: Question: Best way to branch after changes have already been made"
Previous message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "svn 1.2 resoak?"
In reply to: Ben Collins-Sussman: "svn 1.2 resoak?"
Next in thread: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: svn 1.2 resoak?"
Reply: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: svn 1.2 resoak?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]