Re: Medium-term roadmap: 1.3, 1.4, 1.5.

On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 23:23, Philip Martin wrote:
> So you don't want atomic rename per se, you really want local mods to
> move within the working copy. Atomic rename is probably one way to
> achieve that, but I don't think it's the only way, I think the
> copyfrom information recieved during an update could be used to copy
> local mods within the working copy. In cases where the tree change
> really is a copy, rather than a move, the copyfrom solution might be
> superior.

On the contrary, the copyfrom solution seems like a botch unless all
copies are really renames. Just because b is a copy of a doesn't mean
that b should receive copies of modifications to a.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 23 05:27:44 2005