[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Medium-term roadmap: 1.3, 1.4, 1.5.

From: John Szakmeister <john_at_szakmeister.net>
Date: 2005-04-23 02:23:48 CEST

On Friday 22 April 2005 20:01, Philip Martin wrote:
[snip]
> >>
> >> Personally, I would rank them:
> >>
> >> 1.3 Atomic Renames
> >>
> >> 1.4 Server->Client configuration transmission
> >>
> >> 1.5 Operation Logging
> >>
> >> ...but then I haven't been involved with Subversion coding, it is
> >> just my wish list comes out in that order. :-)
> >
> > I'd rank them the same as you David. I'd really like to see the
> > atomic renames taken care of.
>
> Are atomic renames really that attractive, or is merge tracking what
> you really want?

I actually want both. We've run into situations when we're making changes
to the tree that updates didn't make into the new file, and we had to go
back and fix that. I'd also really like merge tracking... but the rename
issue has hit us more than the need for merge tracking lately.

-John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 23 04:15:11 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.